Comments on: OK, here’s a cool CAPTCHA tool I can actually get behind http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/ Stories from the web spam fighters Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:49:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Alex McKee http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/#comment-69 Alex McKee Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:59:54 +0000 http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/#comment-69 I thought of this about a year ago but did not have the ability or the resources to put it into action. I'm excited that it has been done. I thought of this about a year ago but did not have the ability or the resources to put it into action.

I’m excited that it has been done.

]]> By: olpa http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/#comment-36 olpa Sun, 09 Sep 2007 02:40:59 +0000 http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/#comment-36 No, no. The captcha consist of two words: for one the textual value is known, for another -- no. You have to correctly decrypt the first value. The answer to the second is remembered. When statistics is collected, the second word will also have the known value. No, no. The captcha consist of two words: for one the textual value is known, for another — no. You have to correctly decrypt the first value. The answer to the second is remembered. When statistics is collected, the second word will also have the known value.

]]> By: Steve http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/#comment-33 Steve Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:19:47 +0000 http://bbspam.com/2007/09/05/ok-here%e2%80%99s-a-cool-captcha-tool-i-can-actually-get-behind/#comment-33 So wait, the CAPTCHA is an image of a word that you DON'T know a textual value to? Haha, sounds a little broke to me. So wait, the CAPTCHA is an image of a word that you DON’T know a textual value to?

Haha, sounds a little broke to me.

]]>