<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to bypass Textual Confirmation</title>
	<link>http://bbspam.com/2007/08/14/how-to-bypass-textual-confirmation/</link>
	<description>Stories from the web spam fighters</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: olpa</title>
		<link>http://bbspam.com/2007/08/14/how-to-bypass-textual-confirmation/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>olpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bbspam.com/2007/08/14/how-to-bypass-textual-confirmation/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>More about the cost of database: "&lt;a href=""http://bbspam.com/2007/08/12/are-your-sneakers-tied/ rel="nofollow"&gt;Are your sneakers tied?&lt;/a&gt;".

Textual Confirmation, unlike Advanced Textual Confirmation, is a bit weak due to question ID theft. Explanations are at the end of this post: &lt;a href="http://bbspam.com/2007/09/23/how-does-advanced-textual-confirmation-work/" rel="nofollow"&gt;How does Advanced Textual Confirmation work&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More about the cost of database: &#8220;<a href=""http://bbspam.com/2007/08/12/are-your-sneakers-tied/ rel="nofollow">Are your sneakers tied?</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Textual Confirmation, unlike Advanced Textual Confirmation, is a bit weak due to question ID theft. Explanations are at the end of this post: <a href="http://bbspam.com/2007/09/23/how-does-advanced-textual-confirmation-work/" rel="nofollow">How does Advanced Textual Confirmation work</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
